ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

57th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session

Majority Research Staff

House: JUD DP 6-3-0-0

☐ Prop 105 (45 votes)	     ☐ Prop 108 (40 votes)      ☐ Emergency (40 votes)	☐ Fiscal Note


HB 2970: fraudulent schemes; artifices; jurisdiction

Sponsor: Representative Carter N, LD 15

Caucus & COW

Overview

Asserts, in prosecuting the offense of fraudulent schemes and artifices, that the state need not prove that all acts occurred within Arizona or within a single local jurisdiction.

History

Under A.R.S. § 13-2310, it is a class 2 felony to knowingly obtain any benefit through a scheme or artifice to defraud using false pretenses, misrepresentations, promises or material omissions. If the scheme involved a benefit with a value of $100,000 or more, or the marketing of opioids, then the offender is largely ineligible for probation, pardon or other forms of early release. A scheme or artifice to defraud means a scheme that deprives a person of the intangible right of honest services.

Provisions

1.   Provides that, in a prosecution for fraudulent schemes and artifices, the state is not required to establish that all the acts which constitute the violation occurred within Arizona or one of its subdivisions. (Sec. 1)

2.   Asserts that it is not a defense that not all the acts which constitute the violation occurred within Arizona or one of its subdivisions. (Sec. 1)

3.   Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1)

 

 

 

 

 

---------- DOCUMENT FOOTER ---------

Initials NM                HB 2970

2/11/2026        Page 0 Caucus & COW

 

---------- DOCUMENT FOOTER ---------