REFERENCE TITLE: abortion; fetal heartbeat; civil action..

 

 

 

 

 

State of Arizona

House of Representatives

Fifty-fifth Legislature

Second Regular Session

2022

 

 

HB 2483

 

Introduced by

Representatives Martinez: Biasiucci, Blackman, Carroll, Diaz, Fillmore, Parker, Senator Boyer

 

 

AN ACT

 

amending title 12, chapter 3, article 5, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 12-353; amending title 12, chapter 6, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding article 20; Amending section 36-2161, Arizona Revised Statutes; amending title 36, chapter 20, article 2, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 36-2161.01; amending title 36, chapter 23, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding article 3; relating to abortion.

 

 

(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)

 


Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:

Section 1. Title 12, chapter 3, article 5, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 12-353, to read:

START_STATUTE12-353. Award of attorney fees and costs in abortion law challenges

A. Notwithstanding any other law, a person, including an entity, attorney or law firm, that seeks declaratory or injunctive relief to prevent this state, a political subdivision, any governmental entity or public official in this state or any person in this state from enforcing any statute, ordinance, rule, regulation or other type of law that regulates or restricts abortion or that limits taxpayer funding for individuals or entities that perform or promote abortions, in any state or federal court, or that represents any litigant seeking such relief in any state or federal court, is jointly and severally liable to pay the costs and attorney fees of the prevailing party.

B. For the purposes of this section, a party is considered a prevailing party if a state or federal court does either of the following:

1. Dismisses any claim or cause of action brought against the party that seeks the declaratory or injunctive relief described by subsection A of this section, regardless of the reason for the dismissal.

2. Enters judgment in the party's favor on any such claim or cause of action.

C. Regardless of whether a prevailing party sought to recover costs or attorney fees in the underlying action, a prevailing party under this section may bring a civil action to recover costs and attorney fees against a person, including an entity, attorney or law firm, that sought declaratory or injunctive relief described by subsection A of this section not later than the third anniversary after the date on which either of the following occurs, as applicable:

1. The dismissal or judgment described by subsection B of this section becomes final on the conclusion of appellate review.

2. The time for seeking appellate review expires.

D. It is not a defense to an action brought under subsection C of this section that any of the following occurs:

1. A prevailing party under this section failed to seek recovery of costs or attorney fees in the underlying action.

2. The court in the underlying action declined to recognize or enforce the requirements of this section.

3. The court in the underlying action held that any provisions of this section are invalid, unconstitutional or preempted by federal law, notwithstanding the doctrines of issue or claim preclusion. END_STATUTE

Sec. 2. Title 12, chapter 6, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding article 20, to read:

ARTICLE 20. CIVIL LIABILITY FOR AIDING OR ABETTING PROHIBITED ABORTIONS

START_STATUTE12-783. Civil liability; aiding or abetting prohibited abortion

A. A person, Except a person who is an officer or employee of this state or a county, city or town of this state, may bring a civil action against a person who does any of the following:

1. Performs or induces an abortion in violation of title 36, chapter 23, article 3.

2. Knowingly engages in conduct that aids or abets performing or inducing an abortion, including paying for or reimbursing the costs of an abortion through insurance or otherwise, if the abortion is performed or induced in violation of title 36, chapter 23, article 3, regardless of whether the PERSON knew or should have known that the abortion would be performed or induced in violation of title 36, chapter 23, article 3.

3. Intends to engage in the conduct that is described in paragraph 1 or 2 of this subsection.

B. The court shall award all of the following to a PERSON who prevails in an action commenced pursuant to this section:

1. Injunctive relief that is sufficient to prevent the defendant from violating title 36, chapter 23, article 3 or engaging in acts that aid or abet a violation of title 36, chapter 23, article 3.

2. Statutory damages in an amount of $10,000 or more for each abortion that the defendant performed or induced in violation of title 36, chapter 23, article 3 and for each abortion performed or induced in violation of title 36, chapter 23, article 3 in which the defendant aided or abetted.

3. Attorney fees and costs.  This paragraph does not apply to the defendant.

C. Notwithstanding subsection B of this section, a court may not award relief pursuant to this section in response to a violation of subsection A, paragraph 1 or 2 of this section if the defendant demonstrates that the defendant previously paid the full amount of statutory damages under subsection B, paragraph 2 of this section in a previous action for that particular abortion performed or induced in violation of title 36, chapter 23, article 3 or for the particular conduct that aided or abetted an abortion performed or induced in violation of title 36, chapter 23, article 3.

D. Notwithstanding any other law, a person may bring an action pursuant to this section not later than the fourth anniversary after the date the cause of action accrues.

E. Notwithstanding any other law, the following are not a defense to an action brought pursuant to this section:

1. Ignorance or mistake of law.

2. A defendant's belief that the requirements of title 36, chapter 23, article 3 are unconstitutional or were unconstitutional.

3. A defendant's reliance on any court decision that has been overruled on appeal or by a subsequent court, even if that court decision had not been overruled when the defendant engaged in conduct that violates title 36, chapter 23, article 3.

4. A defendant's reliance on any state or federal court decision that is not binding on the court in which the action has been brought.

5. Nonmutual issue preclusion or nonmutual claim preclusion.

6. The consent of the unborn child's mother to the abortion.

7. Any claim that the enforcement of title 36, chapter 23, article 3 or the imposition of civil liability against the defendant will violate the constitutional rights of third parties except as provided by section 12-783.01.

F. It is an affirmative defense if:

1. The person who sued under subsection A, paragraph 2 of this section reasonably believed, after conducting a reasonable investigation, that the physician performing or inducing the abortion had complied or would have complied with title 36, chapter 23, article 3.

2. The person who sued under subsection A, paragraph 3 of this section reasonably believed, after conducting a reasonable investigation, that the physician performing or inducing the abortion will comply with title 36, chapter 23, article 3.

G. The defendant has the burden of proving an affirmative defense under subsection F of this section by a preponderance of the evidence.

H. This section does not impose liability on any speech or conduct that is protected by the first amendment of the United States constitution, as made applicable to the states through the United States supreme court's interpretation of the fourteenth amendment of the United States Constitution or by article II, section 6, Constitution of Arizona.

I. Notwithstanding any other law, a civil action under this section may not be brought by a person who impregnated the abortion patient through an act of sexual assault or incest or any other act in violation of Section 13-1204 or 13-1405. END_STATUTE

START_STATUTE12-783.01. Undue burden defense limitations

A. A defendant against whom an action is brought under section 12-783 does not have standing to assert the rights of women seeking an abortion as a defense to liability under that section unless either of the following occurs:

1. The United States supreme court holds that the courts of this state must confer standing on that defendant to assert the third-party rights of women seeking an abortion in state court as a matter of federal constitutional law.

2. The defendant has standing to assert the rights of women seeking an abortion under the tests for third-party standing established by the United States supreme court.

B. A defendant in an action brought under section 12-783 may assert an affirmative defense to liability under this section if both of the following apply:

1. The defendant has standing to assert the third-party rights of a woman or group of women seeking an abortion in accordance with subsection A of this section.

2. The defendant demonstrates that the relief sought by the claimant will impose an undue burden on that woman or that group of women seeking an abortion.

C. A court may not find an undue burden under subsection B of this section unless the defendant introduces evidence proving either of the following:

1. An award of relief will prevent a woman or a group of women from obtaining an abortion.

2. An award of relief will place a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman or a group of women who are seeking an abortion.

D. A defendant may not establish an undue burden under this section by either of the following:

1. Merely demonstrating that an award of relief will prevent a woman or a group of women from obtaining support or assistance, financial or otherwise, from others in their effort to obtain an abortion.

2. Arguing or attempting to demonstrate that an award of relief against other defendants or other potential defendants will impose an undue burden on a woman or a group of women seeking an abortion.

E. The affirmative defense under subsection B of this section is not available if the United States supreme court overrules Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) or Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992), regardless of whether the conduct on which the cause of action is based under section 12-783 occurred before the Supreme Court overruled either of those decisions.

F. This section does not limit or preclude a defendant from asserting the defendant's personal constitutional rights as a defense to liability under section 12-783, and a court may not award relief under section 12-783 if the conduct for which the defendant has been sued was an exercise of state or federal constitutional rights that personally belong to the defendant. END_STATUTE

START_STATUTE12-783.02. Venue

A. Notwithstanding any other law, a civil action that is brought pursuant to section 12-783 shall be brought in any of the following counties:

1. The county in which all or a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

2. The county of residence for any one of the natural person defendants at the time the cause of action accrued.

3. The county of the principal office in this state of any one of the defendants that is not a natural person.

4. The county of residence for the claimant if the claimant is a natural person residing in this state.

B. If a civil action is brought under section 12-783 in any one of the venues described in subsection A of this section, the action may not be transferred to a different venue without the written consent of all parties. END_STATUTE

START_STATUTE12-783.03. Immunity

A. This article prevails over any conflicting law, including Chapter 10, article 2 of this title.

b. This state has sovereign immunity, a political subdivision of this state has governmental immunity and each officer and employee of this state or a political subdivision of this state has official immunity in any action, claim or counterclaim or any type of legal or equitable action that challenges the validity of any provision or application of title 36, chapter 23, article 3 on constitutional grounds or otherwise.

C. A provision of state law does not waive or abrogate an immunity described by Subsection b of this section unless it expressly waives immunity under this section. END_STATUTE

END_STATUTESec. 3. Section 36-2161, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:

START_STATUTE36-2161. Abortions; reporting requirements

A. A hospital or facility in this state where abortions are performed must submit to the department of health services on a form prescribed by the department a report of each abortion performed in the hospital or facility. The report shall not identify the individual patient by name or include any other information or identifier that would make it possible to identify, in any manner or under any circumstances, a woman who has obtained or sought to obtain an abortion.  The report must include the following information:

1. The name and address of the facility where the abortion was performed.

2. The type of facility where the abortion was performed.

3. The county where the abortion was performed.

4. The woman's age.

5. The woman's educational background by highest grade completed and, if applicable, level of college completed.

6. The county and state in which the woman resides.

7. The woman's race and ethnicity.

8. The woman's marital status.

9. The number of prior pregnancies and prior abortions of the woman.

10. The number of previous spontaneous terminations of pregnancy of the woman.

11. The gestational age of the unborn child at the time of the abortion.

12. The reason for the abortion, including at least one of the following:

(a) The abortion is elective.

(b) The abortion is due to maternal health considerations, including one of the following:

(i) A premature rupture of membranes.

(ii) An anatomical abnormality.

(iii) Chorioamnionitis.

(iv) Preeclampsia.

(v) Other.

(c) The abortion is due to fetal health considerations, including the fetus being diagnosed with at least one of the following:

(i) A lethal anomaly.

(ii) A central nervous system anomaly.

(iii) Other.

(d) The pregnancy is the result of a sexual assault.

(e) The pregnancy is the result of incest.

(f) The woman is being coerced into obtaining an abortion.

(g) The woman is a victim of sex trafficking.

(h) The woman is a victim of domestic violence.

(i) Other.

(j) The woman declined to answer.

13. The type of procedure performed or prescribed and the date of the abortion.

14. Any preexisting medical conditions of the woman that would complicate pregnancy.

15. Any known medical complication that resulted from the abortion, including at least one of the following:

(a) Shock.

(b) Uterine perforation.

(c) Cervical laceration requiring suture or repair.

(d) Heavy bleeding or hemorrhage with estimated blood loss of at least five hundred cubic centimeters.

(e) Aspiration or allergic response.

(f) Postprocedure infection.

(g) Sepsis.

(h) Incomplete abortion retaining part of the fetus requiring reevacuation.

(i) Damage to the uterus.

(j) Failed termination of pregnancy.

(k) Death of the patient.

(l) Other.

(m) None.

16. The basis for any medical judgment that a medical emergency existed that excused the physician from compliance with the requirements of this chapter or chapter 23, article 3 of this title.

17. The physician's statement if required pursuant to section 36-2301.01.

18. If applicable, the weight of the aborted fetus for any abortion performed pursuant to section 36-2301.01.

19. Whether a fetus or embryo was delivered alive as defined in section 36-2301 during or immediately after an attempted abortion and the efforts made to promote, preserve and maintain the life of the fetus or embryo pursuant to section 36-2301.

20. Statements by the physician and all clinical staff who observed the fetus or embryo during or immediately after the abortion certifying under penalty of perjury that, to the best of their knowledge, the aborted fetus or embryo was not delivered alive as defined in section 36-2301.

21. The medical specialty of the physician performing the abortion, including one of the following:

(a) Obstetrics-gynecology.

(b) General or family practice.

(c) Emergency medicine.

(d) Other.

22. The type of admission for the patient, including whether the abortion was performed:

(a) As an outpatient procedure in an abortion clinic.

(b) As an outpatient procedure at a hospital.

(c) As an inpatient procedure at a hospital.

(d) As an outpatient procedure at a health care institution other than an abortion clinic or hospital.

23. Whether anesthesia was administered to the mother.

24. Whether anesthesia was administered to the unborn child.

25. Whether any genetic abnormality of the unborn child was detected at or before the time of the abortion by genetic testing, such as maternal serum tests, or by ultrasound, such as nuchal translucency screening, or by other forms of testing.

26. If a surgical abortion was performed, the method of final disposition of bodily remains and whether the woman exercised her right to choose the final disposition of bodily remains.

B. The hospital or facility shall request the information specified in subsection A, paragraph 12 of this section at the same time the information pursuant to section 36-2153 is provided to the woman individually and in a private room to protect the woman's privacy. The information requested pursuant to subsection A, paragraph 12 of this section may be obtained on a medical form provided to the woman to complete if the woman completes the form individually and in a private room.

C. If the woman who is seeking the abortion discloses that the abortion is being sought because of a reason described in subsection A, paragraph 12, subdivision (d), (e), (f), (g) or (h) of this section, the hospital or facility shall provide the woman with information regarding the woman's right to report a crime to law enforcement and resources available for assistance and services, including a national human trafficking resource hotline.

D. The report must be signed by the physician who performed the abortion or, if a health professional other than a physician is authorized by law to prescribe or administer abortion medication, the signature and title of the person who prescribed or administered the abortion medication.  The form may be signed electronically and shall indicate that the person who signs the report is attesting that the information in the report is correct to the best of the person's knowledge. The hospital or facility must transmit the report to the department within fifteen days after the last day of each reporting month.

E. Any report filed pursuant to this section shall be filed electronically at an internet website that is designated by the department unless the person required to file the report applies for a waiver from electronic reporting by submitting a written request to the department.END_STATUTE

Sec. 4. Title 36, chapter 20, article 2, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 36-2161.01, to read:

START_STATUTE36-2161.01. Medical emergency; required documentation

A. In addition to any other reporting requirement in this chapter or chapter 23 of this title, if an abortion is performed or induced on a pregnant woman because of a medical emergency, the physician who performs or induces the abortion shall execute a written document that certifies the abortion is necessary due to a medical emergency and that specifies the woman's medical condition requiring the abortion. 

B. The physician shall do both of the following:

1. Place the document described in subsection A of this section in the pregnant woman's medical record.

2. Maintain a copy of the document described in subsection A of this section in the physician's practice records.

C. A physician who performs or induces an abortion on a pregnant woman shall either:

1. If the abortion is performed or induced to preserve the health of the pregnant woman, execute a written document that both:

(a) Specifies the medical condition the abortion is asserted to address.

(b) Provides the medical rationale for the physician's conclusion that the abortion is necessary to address the medical condition.

2. For an abortion other than an abortion described by paragraph 1 of this subsection, specify in a written document that maternal health is not a purpose of the abortion.

D. The physician shall maintain a copy of the document described by subsection C of this section in the physician's practice records.END_STATUTE

Sec. 5. Title 36, chapter 23, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding article 3, to read:

ARTICLE 3. DETECTION OF FETAL HEARTBEAT

START_STATUTE36-2321. Definitions

In this article, UNLESS the context otherwise requires:

1. "Fetal heartbeat" means cardiac activity or the steady and repetitive rhythmic contraction of the fetal heart within the gestational sac.

2. "Gestational age" means the amount of time that has elapsed from the first day of a woman's last menstrual period.

3. "Gestational sac" means the structure that is composed of the extraembryonic membranes that envelop the unborn child and that is typically visible by ultrasound after the fourth week of pregnancy.

4. "Physician" means an individual who is licensed to practice medicine in this state pursuant to title 32, chapter 13 or 17.

5. "Pregnancy" means the human female reproductive condition that:

(a) Begins with fertilization.

(b) Occurs when a woman is carrying a developing human offspring.

(c) Is calculated from the first day of the woman's last menstrual period.

6. "Standard medical practice" means the degree of skill, care and diligence that an obstetrician of ordinary judgment, learning and skill would employ in like circumstances.

7. "Unborn child" means a human fetus or embryo in any stage of gestation from fertilization until birth.END_STATUTE

START_STATUTE36-2322. Determining presence of fetal heartbeat; requirements; record; definition

A. Except as provided by section 36-2324, a physician may not knowingly perform or induce an abortion on a pregnant woman unless the physician determines, in accordance with this section, whether the woman's unborn child has a detectable fetal heartbeat.

B. In making a determination under subsection A of this section, the physician must use a test that is both:

1. Consistent with the physician's good faith and reasonable understanding of standard medical practice.

2. Appropriate for the estimated gestational age of the unborn child and the condition of the pregnant woman and her pregnancy.

C. A physician who makes a determination under subsection A of this section shall record in the pregnant woman's medical record all of the following:

1. The estimated gestational age of the unborn child.

2. The method used to estimate the gestational age.

3. The test used for detecting a fetal heartbeat, including the date, time and results of the test.

D. For the purposes of determining the presence of a fetal heartbeat under this section, "standard medical practice" includes employing the appropriate means of detecting the heartbeat based on the estimated gestational age of the unborn child and the condition of the woman and her pregnancy.END_STATUTE

START_STATUTE36-2323. Abortion of unborn child with detectable fetal heartbeat; prohibition; effect

A. Except as provided by section 36-2324, a physician may not knowingly perform or induce an abortion on a pregnant woman if the physician detects a fetal heartbeat for the unborn child as required by section 36-2322 or fails to perform a test to detect a fetal heartbeat.

B. A physician does not violate this section if the physician performs a test for a fetal heartbeat as required by section 36-2322 and does not detect a fetal heartbeat.

C. This section does not affect either:

1. The provisions of chapter 20 of this title or this chapter that restrict or regulate an abortion by a particular method or during a particular stage of pregnancy.

2. Any other provision of state law that regulates or prohibits abortion.END_STATUTE

START_STATUTE36-2324. Medical emergency exception; records

A. Sections 36-2322 and 36-2323 do not apply if a physician believes a medical emergency exists that prevents complying with this article.

B. A physician who performs or induces an abortion under circumstances described by subsection A of this section shall make written notations in the pregnant woman's medical record of both:

1. The physician's belief that a medical emergency necessitated the abortion.

2. The medical condition of the pregnant woman that prevented complying with this article.

C. A physician who performs or induces an abortion under this section shall maintain in the physician's practice records a copy of the notations made under subsection B of this section.END_STATUTE

START_STATUTE36-2325. Construction of article

A. This article does not establish or recognize a right to abortion before a fetal heartbeat is detected.

B. This article does not do any of the following:

1. Authorize the initiation of a cause of action against or the prosecution of a woman on whom an abortion is performed or induced or attempted to be performed or induced in violation of this article.

2. Wholly or partly repeal, either expressly or by implication, any other statute that regulates or prohibits abortion.

3. Restrict a political subdivision of this state from regulating or prohibiting abortion in a manner that is at least as stringent as the laws of this state.END_STATUTE

START_STATUTE36-2326. Statutory construction of abortion statutes

A. A statute that regulates or prohibits abortion does not repeal any other statute that regulates or prohibits abortion, either wholly or partly, unless the repealing statute explicitly states that it is repealing the other statute.

b. A statute does not restrict a political subdivision of this state from regulating or prohibiting abortion in a manner that is at least as stringent as the laws of this state unless the statute explicitly states that political subdivisions of this state are prohibited from regulating or prohibiting abortion in the manner described by the statute.

c. Every statute that regulates or prohibits abortion is severable in each of its applications to every person and circumstance. If any statute that regulates or prohibits abortion is found by any court to be unconstitutional, either on its face or as applied, all applications of that statute that do not violate the United States Constitution and Arizona Constitution shall be severed from the unconstitutional applications and shall remain enforceable, notwithstanding any other law, and the statute shall be interpreted as if containing language limiting the statute's application to the persons, group of persons or circumstances for which the statute's application will not violate the United States Constitution and Arizona Constitution.

START_STATUTE36-2327. Limits on public enforcement

A. Notwithstanding any other law, the requirements of this article shall be enforced exclusively through private civil actions pursuant to title 12, chapter 6, article 20.  Enforcement of this article and enforcement of title 13, chapters 11 and 12 in response to violations of this article may not be taken or threatened by this state, a political subdivision of this state, a county attorney or an executive or administrative officer or employee of this state or a political subdivision of this state against any person, except as provided in section 12-783.

B. Subsection A of this section does not:

1. Legalize the conduct prohibited by this article.

2. Limit in any way or affect the availability of a remedy established by section 12-783.

3. Limit the enforceability of any other laws that regulate or prohibit abortion.END_STATUTE

Sec. 6. Legislative findings; intent

A. The legislature finds, according to contemporary medical research, that:

1. Fetal heartbeat has become a key medical predictor that an unborn child will reach live birth.

2. Cardiac activity begins at a biologically identifiable moment in time, normally when the fetal heart is formed in the gestational sac.

3. Arizona has compelling interests from the outset of a woman's pregnancy in protecting the health of the woman and the life of the unborn child.

4. To make an informed choice about whether to continue her pregnancy, the pregnant woman has a compelling interest in knowing the likelihood of her unborn child surviving to full-term birth based on the presence of cardiac activity.

B. The legislature finds that the state of Arizona never repealed, either expressly or by implication, the state statutes enacted before the ruling in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) that prohibit and criminalize abortion unless the mother's life is in danger.

Sec. 7. Applicability

This act applies only to abortions that are performed or induced on or after the effective date of this act.

Sec. 8. Severability

A. Mindful of Leavitt v. Jane L., 518 U.S. 137 (1996), in which, in the context of determining the severability of a state statute regulating abortion, the United States Supreme Court held that an explicit statement of legislative intent is controlling, it is the intent of the legislature that every provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this act and every application of the provisions in this act are severable from each other.

B. If a court finds any application of any provision in this act to any person, group of persons or circumstances to be invalid or unconstitutional, the remaining applications of that provision to all other persons and circumstances shall be severed and may not be affected.  All constitutionally valid applications of this act shall be severed from any applications that a court finds to be invalid, leaving the valid applications in force, because it is the legislature's intent and priority that the valid applications be allowed to stand alone.  Even if a reviewing court finds a provision of this act to impose an undue burden in a large or substantial fraction of relevant cases, the applications that do not present an undue burden shall be severed from the remaining applications, shall remain in force and shall be treated as if the legislature had enacted a statute limited to the persons, group of persons or circumstances for which the statute's application does not present an undue burden.

C. If a court declares or finds a provision of this act facially unconstitutional, when discrete applications of that provision can be enforced against a person, group of persons or circumstances without violating the United States Constitution and Constitution of Arizona, those applications shall be severed from all remaining applications of the provision, and the provision shall be interpreted as if the legislature had enacted a provision limited to the persons, group of persons or circumstances for which the provision's application will not violate the United States Constitution and Constitution of Arizona.

D. The legislature further declares that it would have enacted this act, and each provision, section, subsection, article, sentence, clause, phrase or word, and all constitutional applications of this act, irrespective of the fact that any provision, section, subsection, sentence, article, clause, phrase or word, or applications of this act, were to be declared unconstitutional or to represent an undue burden.

E. If a court finds any provision of this act to be unconstitutionally vague, the applications of that provision that do not present constitutional vagueness problems shall be severed and remain in force.

F. A court may not decline to enforce the severability requirements of subsections A, B, C, D and E of this section on the ground that severance would rewrite the statute or involve the court in legislative or lawmaking activity.  A court that declines to enforce or enjoins a state official from enforcing a statutory provision does not rewrite a statute, as the statute continues to contain the same words as before the court's decision.  A judicial injunction or declaration of unconstitutionality:

1. Is nothing more than an edict prohibiting enforcement that may subsequently be vacated by a later court if that court has a different understanding of the requirements of the Constitution of Arizona or United States Constitution.

2. Is not a formal amendment of the language in a statute.

3. No more rewrites a statute than a decision by the executive not to enforce a duly enacted statute in a limited and defined set of circumstances.

Sec. 9. Short title

This act may be cited as the "Arizona Heartbeat Act".