Assigned to HHS                                                                                                 AS PASSED BY COMMITTEE

 


 

 

 


ARIZONA STATE SENATE

Fifty-Fifth Legislature, Second Regular Session

 

AMENDED

FACT SHEET FOR S.b. 1210

 

mentally ill; transportation; evaluation; treatment

Purpose

Allows the court, an admitting officer or evaluation agency to authorize apprehension and transportation of a proposed patient to an evaluation agency by an authorized transporter. Establishes the Study Committee on Alternative Behavioral Health Transportation (Committee) and outlines Committee membership, duties and requirements.

Background

Current statute authorizes any individual to apply for a court-ordered evaluation of a person alleged to be, as a result of a mental disorder, a danger to self or others or a person with a persistent, acute or grave disability that is unwilling or able to under a voluntary evaluation (A.R.S.
§ 36-520
). The petition for evaluation must include: 1) the name and address of the petitioner and the proposed patient; 2) the present whereabouts of the proposed patient; 3) a statement alleging there is reasonable cause to believe the proposed patient has a mental disorder, is a danger to self or others, has a persistent, acute or grave disability and is unwilling to or unable to undergo voluntary evaluation; 4) a summary of facts that support the allegations, including the facts that brought the proposed patient to the screening agency's attention; 5) any known criminal history of the proposed patient, if the petition is filed by a prosecutor, including whether the patient has even been found incompetent to stand trial; and 6) other information that the Director of the Department of Health Services (DHS) or the court may require (A.R.S. § 36-523)

If the admitting officer of an evaluation agency has reasonable cause to believe that an emergency examination of a proposed patient is necessary, based on a review of the conversation with the applicant and peace officer, the admitting officer may advise the peace officer that sufficient ground exists to take the person into custody and transport the person to the evaluation agency. The peace officer, on advice of the admitting officer, must apprehend and transport the person to the evaluation agency (A.R.S. §§ 36-524 and 36-525).

There is no anticipated fiscal impact to the state General Fund associated with this legislation.

Provisions

Court-Ordered Evaluation

1.   Allows the court, an admitting officer or evaluation agency to authorize apprehension and transportation of a proposed patient by an authorized transporter if the entity has authorized apprehension and transportation of the patient by a peace officer.

2.   Specifies the following individuals or entities are not civilly liable for the apprehension and transportation of a proposed patient, except under acts of gross negligence:

a)   a person who provides a court, admitting officer or an evaluation agency with facts and circumstances or expressed an opinion that a proposed patient may be safely apprehended and transported to an evaluation agency by an authorized transporter without peace officer assistance;

b)   the court;

c)   the evaluation agency;

d)   an admitting officer of the evaluation agency; and

e)   the authorized transporter.

3.   States that evaluation agencies are not financially responsible for the use of an authorized transporter or for serving notices of hearing, copies of a petition or affidavits in support of the petition.

4.   Requires an evaluation petition to include a statement of any facts and circumstances that lead the petitioner to believe that the proposed patient may be safely transported to the evaluation agency by an authorized transporter without peace officer assistance.

5.   Requires any order and petition for court-ordered evaluation to be served on the proposed patient as directed by the court or court rule.

6.   Directs the peace officer or other authorized person required to serve the notice hearing to file a proof of service with the court specifying the date, time and manner of service.

7.   Stipulates that a petition for court-ordered treatment must contain a statement of any facts and circumstances that led the petitioner to believe the proposed patient may be safely transported to an evaluation agency by an authorized transporter without the assistance of a peace officer, if the patient is not detained in an evaluation agency at the time the order is filed.

8.   Requires the person who serves the hearing notice, the copy of the petition and the affidavits in support of the petition to be either a peace officer or another person authorized by the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure.

9.   Defines authorized transporter as a transportation entity that is contracted with a jurisdiction to pay for the provision of transportation of proposed patients to an evaluation agency and is either:

a)   an ambulance company that holds a valid certificate of necessity; or

b)   a transportation provider authorized by the state to provide safe behavioral health transportation.

Study Committee on Alternative Behavioral Health Transportation

10.  Establishes the Committee, consisting of the following members:

a)   two members of the Senate from different political parties, with one member to serve as Co-Chair, appointed by the President of the Senate;

b)   two members of the House of Representatives from different political parties, with one member to serve as Co-Chair, appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives;

c)   the DHS Director or the Director's designee;

d)   the Director of the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System or the Director's designee;

e)   a representative of a law enforcement agency from a county with a population of fewer than 1,000,000 persons, appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives;

f) a representative of a law enforcement agency from a county with a population of 1,000,000 persons or greater, appointed by the President of the Senate;

g)   a representative of an evaluation agency, appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives;

h)   two representatives of behavioral health advocacy organizations, one of whom is appointed by the President of the Senate and the other by the Speaker of the House of Representatives;

i) a representative of a regional behavioral health authority, appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives; and

j) a psychiatrist that is employed by a special health care district, appointed by the President of the Senate.

11.  Requires the Committee to research and make recommendations for the implementation and use of alternative behavioral health transportation providers for individuals involved in
court-ordered evaluation or treatment as an alternative to transportation by peace officers, including:

a)   establishing criteria for the certification of behavioral health transportation providers, including the development of a training curriculum required to achieve the certification;

b)   recommending the appropriate agency for providing certification;

c)   identifying barriers to the use of alternative behavioral health transportation; and

d)   detailing the costs associated with the implementation of alternative transportation providers, including cost savings and benefits.

12.  Permits the Committee to hold hearings, conduct fact-finding tours and take testimony from witnesses, including participants in the behavioral health and law enforcement systems who may assist the Committee in fulfilling responsibilities.

13.  Requires the Legislature to provide staff and support services to the Committee.

14.  Requires the Committee, by December 31, 2023, to submit a report of its findings and recommendations to the Governor, President of the Senate, Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Secretary of State.

15.  Repeals the Committee on July 1, 2024.

Miscellaneous

16.  Makes technical and conforming changes.

17.  Becomes effective on the general effective date.

Amendments Adopted by Committee

1.   States that evaluation agencies are not financially responsible for the use of an authorized transporter or for serving notices of hearing, copies of a petition or affidavits in support of the petition.

2.   Requires an authorized transporter to pay the costs of transporting a proposed patient.

3.   Requires any order and petition for court-ordered evaluation to be served on the proposed patient as directed by the court or court rule.

4.   Requires persons that serve orders of treatment and petitions to be a peace officer or another person authorized by the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure.

Senate Action

HHS                2/16/22      DPA       6-2-0

Prepared by Senate Research

February 18, 2022

MM/sr/slp