administrative review of agency decisions
State of Arizona
First Regular Session
SENATE BILL 1063
amending sections 12-910 and 28-3317, Arizona Revised Statutes; relating to administrative reviews.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)
Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Section 1. Section 12-910, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
12-910. Scope of review
A. An action to review a final administrative decision shall be heard and determined with convenient speed. If requested by a party to an action within thirty days after filing a notice of appeal, the court shall hold an evidentiary hearing, including testimony and argument, to the extent necessary to make the determination required by subsection E F of this section. The court may hear testimony from witnesses who testified at the administrative hearing and witnesses who were not called to testify at the administrative hearing.
B. Relevant and admissible exhibits and testimony that were not offered during the administrative hearing shall be admitted, and objections that a party failed to make to evidence offered at the administrative hearing shall be considered, unless either of the following is true:
1. The exhibit, testimony or objection was withheld for purposes of delay, harassment or other improper purpose.
2. Allowing admission of the exhibit or testimony or consideration of the objection would cause substantial prejudice to another party.
C. For review of final administrative decisions of agencies that are exempt from sections 41-1092.03, through 41-1092.04, 41-1092.05, 41-1092.06, 41-1092.07, 41-1092.08, 41-1092.09, 41-1092.10 and 41-1092.11, pursuant to section 41-1092.02, the trial shall be de novo if trial de novo is demanded in the notice of appeal or motion of an appellee other than the agency and if a hearing was not held by the agency or the proceedings before the agency were not stenographically reported or mechanically recorded so that a transcript might be made. On demand of any party, if a trial de novo is available under this section, it may be with a jury, except that a trial of an administrative decision under section 25-522 shall be to the court.
D. For review of final administrative decisions of agencies that regulate a profession or occupation pursuant to title 32, title 36, chapter 4, article 6, title 36, chapter 6, article 7 or title 36, chapter 17, the trial shall be de novo if trial de novo is demanded in the notice of appeal or motion of an appellee other than the agency.
D. E. The record in the superior court shall consist of the record of the administrative proceeding, and the record of any evidentiary hearing, or the record of the trial de novo.
E. F. After reviewing the administrative record and supplementing evidence presented at the evidentiary hearing, the court may affirm, reverse, modify or vacate and remand the agency action. The court shall affirm the agency action unless the court concludes that the agency's action is contrary to law, is not supported by substantial evidence, is arbitrary and capricious or is an abuse of discretion. In a proceeding brought by or against the regulated party, the court shall decide all questions of law, including the interpretation of a constitutional or statutory provision or a rule adopted by an agency, without deference to any previous determination that may have been made on the question by the agency. in a proceeding brought by or against the regulated party, the court shall decide all questions of fact without deference to any previous determination that may have been made on the question by the agency. Notwithstanding any other law, this subsection applies in any action for judicial review of any agency action that is authorized by law.
F. G. Notwithstanding subsection E F of this section, if the action arises out of title 20, chapter 15, article 2, the court shall affirm the agency action unless after reviewing the administrative record and supplementing evidence presented at the evidentiary hearing the court concludes that the action is not supported by substantial evidence, is contrary to law, is arbitrary and capricious or is an abuse of discretion.
G. H. This section does not apply to any agency action by an agency that is created pursuant to article XV, Constitution of Arizona.
Sec. 2. Section 28-3317, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
A. Unless the cancellation or revocation is mandatory under this chapter, a person who is denied a license or whose license is canceled, suspended or revoked by the department may seek judicial review pursuant to title 12, chapter 7, article 6, except that section 12-910, subsections A, B, D and E and F do not apply.
B. The court shall expedite the disposition of appeals pursuant to this section.
C. The court hearing and determination shall extend to all questions of law and fact presented by the entire record before the court. The court shall not hear new or additional evidence in support of or in opposition to a finding, order, determination or decision of the department, except in cases in which, in the discretion of the court, justice demands the admission of new or additional evidence.