ARIZONA STATE SENATE
Fiftieth Legislature, Second Regular Session
FACT SHEET FOR S.C.R. 1034
judicial elections
Purpose
Subject to voter approval, constitutionally provides for judicial elections for Arizona Supreme Court justices and superior court judges in counties with a population greater than 250,000.
Background
Article VI of the Arizona Constitution outlines the requirements pertaining to the judicial department. It establishes judicial power, jurisdiction and authority, composition, qualifications, duties and process. Judicial power is vested in an integrated judicial department consisting of a Supreme Court, appellate courts as provided by law, a superior court, courts inferior to the superior court as provided by law and justice courts.
The Arizona Constitution was amended in 1974 to create a merit selection and retention system for judges. Vacancies in the appellate court and in superior courts that exist in counties with a population greater than 250,000 are filled by nominating a prospective judge through a corresponding nominating commission. There are three nominating commissions, which include the Commission on Appellate Court Appointments, the Maricopa County Commission on Trial Court Appointments and the Pima County Commission on Trial Court Appointments. Each Commission has 16 members, 10 public and 5 attorneys, along with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Members of the commissions are appointed by the Governor and must receive Senate confirmation.
There is no anticipated fiscal impact to the state General Fund.
Provisions
a) Article VI, § 36, relating to the Commission on Appellate Court Appointments;
b) Article VI, § 37, relating to judicial vacancies and appointments;
c) Article VI, § 38, relating to the declaration of candidacy to be retained in office;
d) Article VI, § 40, relating to the option of certain counties in selecting judges;
e) Article VI, § 41, relating to the Commission on Trial Court Appointments; and
f) Article VI, § 42, relating to retention evaluation of justices and judges.
Prepared by Senate Research
February 13, 2012
GK/tf