top border
border border
line
Arizona State Legislature
Capitol Roof picture
Forty-ninth Legislature - First Regular Session
 
 
HB2412 - 482R - Senate Fact Sheet

Assigned to JUD                                                                                                                              FOR COMMITTEE

 

 


 

 

ARIZONA STATE SENATE

Forty-eighth Legislature, Second Regular Session

 

REVISED

FACT SHEET FOR H.B. 2412

 

criminal trespass; day laborers

 

Purpose

 

            Expands the definition of criminal trespass to include specific activities involving the solicitation of day labor employment.  Defines terms. 

 

Background

 

Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-1504 provides that a person commits criminal trespass in the first degree by knowingly entering or remaining unlawfully: a) in or on a residential structure; b) in a fenced residential yard; c) in any residential yard and, without lawful authority, looking into the residential structure in reckless disregard of infringing on the inhabitant's right of privacy; d) on real property that is subject to a valid mineral claim or lease with the intent to hold, work, take or explore for minerals on the claim or lease; e) on the property of another and burning, defacing, mutilating or otherwise desecrating a religious symbol or other religious property of another without the express permission of the owner of the property; or f) in or on a critical public service facility.

 

Depending on the circumstances, criminal trespass in the first degree provides penalties ranging from a class 1 misdemeanor to a class 6 felony.

 

H.B. 2412 is similar to H.B. 2589, which passed out of the Legislature in 2007 and was vetoed by the Governor.  The Governor indicated in her veto message that H.B. 2589 was vague, overbroad and discriminatory.  While the Governor recognized the need to stop unlawful employment practices that fuel demand for illegal immigration, H.B. 2589 applied to any Arizona adult citizen seeking work while standing adjacent to a public street, and hard working Arizonans willing to “pound the pavement” to find lawful work should not be subject to criminal penalties.  The Governor also expressed concern that H.B. 2589 would be found unconstitutional as it allowed such solicitations by persons under 18 years of age and noted that there is no rational basis for discriminating on the basis of age for this type of conduct.

 

There is no anticipated fiscal impact to the state General Fund associated with this legislation; however, expanding the classification of criminal trespass in the first degree could increase incarceration costs.

 


Provisions

 

1.      Classifies as criminal trespass in the first degree, if a person knowingly: a) stands or remains on any public highway or public street or any property adjacent and disrupts vehicle or pedestrian traffic for the purpose of soliciting day labor employment; b) stands or remains unlawfully on any private property after a reasonable request to leave by the owner or any other person having lawful control over the property, or reasonable notice prohibiting entry, for the purpose of soliciting day labor employment. 

 

2.      Defines “day labor employment” as employment in which the initial employment offer occurs at an uncontrolled location; promptly or shortly after the employment offer is made, the employer, directly or through an agent, transports the employee from the uncontrolled location to a different location where the employee will work or otherwise directs the employee to that location; and the duration of the employment does not exceed two days.

 

3.      Presumes any employment in which the initial offer occurs at an uncontrolled location and the employee is transported or directed from an uncontrolled location to a direct location by the employer or agent, promptly or shortly after the employment offer is made, to be for two days or less.  Allows the presumption to be rebutted by presenting evidence of a written employment contract for a period of three or more days.

 

4.      Defines “soliciting” as verbal or nonverbal communication by a gesture or nod that would indicate to a reasonable person that a person is willing to employ or to be employed.

 

5.      Defines “uncontrolled location” as all locations except property that is owned, rented or otherwise controlled by the employer and property where the employer serves as a contractor or subcontractor if any work offer made by the employer or an agent of the employer is for work at that property.

 

6.      Makes a technical change.

 

7.      Becomes effective on the general effective date. 

 

Revision

 

·      Added Governor’s veto message from H.B. 2589, passed by the Legislature in 2007.

 

House Action

 

HSPR              2/18/08     DP     5-3-0-2-0

3rd Read           3/11/08               37-22-1-0

 

Prepared by Senate Research

April 7, 2008

CEW/HB/ac